Bluehost vs SiteGround Hosting Comparison

Bluehost vs SiteGround: this hosting comparison is ideal if you want to change your hosting company or buy a new hosting plan

Today the battle is between Bluehost vs SiteGround for WordPress bloggers and online entrepreneurs, with a thorough comparison that is also useful for those using other CMS.

bluehost vs siteground

Bluehost and SiteGround are extremely reliable companies, and in this post we will make a full analysis of each and every aspect you should consider when buying a hosting plan. That includes a number of important techinal aspects, such as hosting speed, types of plans and extras like purchasing a dedicated IP.

Other than that, less technical aspects are also extremely important, such as hosting pricing and the quality and availability of a hosting customer support.

Therefore lets start our analysis to see who wins the Bluehost vs SiteGround hosting comparison, starting with a brief overview of each one of these two hosting giants.

Bluehost vs SiteGround: Overview

  vs siteground-logo-small

This hosting comparison between Bluehost vs SiteGround, is aimed of two types of users basically. The first case is if you are new to online business and this is the first time you are buying a hosting plan. Regardless of which hosting service you are planning to purchase, a thorough analysis is important to minimize costs and maximize efficiency.

The second type of user is someone who already has experience in online marketing and blogging and is looking to change his current hosting plan to Bluehost or SiteGround. This can be the case for websites currently using Bluehost or SiteGround, or even if you use none of them, but is attracted to their offers

Below we have a short summary of each hosting aspect I consider important to determine who will win our Bluehost vs SiteGround hosting comparison:

Check SiteGround Offers Check Bluehost Offers

Hosting Speed
User Interface
Server Locations
Shared Hosting
Cloud and Dedicated Hosting
WordPress Hosting
Customer Support
WordPress Install
Dedicated IP and SSL

Bluehost vs SiteGround: Hosting Speed

The first aspect analysed in our comparison is the hosting speed, and there is a good reason for that. The server speed is one of the most critical points of any hosting company and impacts majorly our website usability and SEO.

To determine the hosting speed one can do a simple server response time. The response time figures indicates the first signal e a server sends when pinged. The lower this value is, the fastest your server is.

Ideally, one should do this test from different locations. That guarantees an more accurate overall result of each hosting provider and how fast it is. Below we have the analysis of websites hosted on Bluehost and SiteGround shared plans to analyze their overall server performance.

Bluehost Hosting Speed

Firstly, let’s start analyzing the Bluehost shared host server speed. Using the free tool available on Site24x7 we can test any website server from multiple locations around the world.

Check the data below:


The fastest response time was from a location in California, followed by Toronto, Canada. This can easily be understood by the fact that the Bluehost physical server in question is also in North America.

The slowest response times however came from locations further away, such as Chennai and Johannesburg. Even if Singapore is also pretty far away from North America, its fast internet connection results in a lower ping to the Bluehost Server.

The average server response time from the Bluehost based website was of 175 ms, which is pretty good overall. For this reason Bluehost deserved a place in our list of the fastest WordPress hosting companies.

SiteGround Hosting Speed

After analyzing Bluehost hosting speed its time to see how SiteGround performed in our server response time test. Below are the results for SiteGround, from the same locations tested with Bluehost.


SiteGround server response time test has a similar result than the one made with Bluehost. As we can see, the lowest pings are from locations in North America. Toronto, Canada had an impressive server response average of just 11 ms.

The server response test for SiteGround was extremely positive, with an average of 163 ms. That is faster than Bluehost and one of the fastest hosting companies currently in the market.

User Interface

Both Bluehost and SiteGround have a very intuitive and easy to use Dashboard. For managing most things in your hosting, you will use the cPanel in most of the cases.

This is how Bluehost cPanel (backend) looks like, a little bit different than most cPanels, but with pretty much the same options:


Now, let’s see the SiteGround cPanel design:


Even if they look rather different, they perform the same functions in pretty much the same way. You can read more about cPanel here.


Just like all main hosting companies, both SiteGround and Bluehost have a very high uptime. SiteGround claims an uptime of 99.99% and Bluehost has been analyzed by several individual websites that also indicate an uptime above 99.9%.

Server Locations

To know the exact location of the physical server in which your plan will be hosted is important for a number of reasons. The most important of them is geo-targeting.

For example, if the main target audience of your audience is in Germany, ideally you should have a server based in Europe, for faster content delivery to your audience. If your audience is international, I would recommend North America, as it has average good pings with most parts of the world.

Apart from knowing your server location, you might also want to add a CDN to your website. This way you can improve your content delivery drastically to most locations in the world.

Bluehost Server Location: Despite not clearly stating it on their website, from our tests and evidences, Bluehost data centers are mostly based in the United States.

SiteGround Server Location: SiteGround has several locations around the world, which can be good for geo-targeting your visitors. Some of the locations are: Chicago, London, Amsterdam, Milan and Singapore.

Bluehost vs SiteGround: Shared Hosting

Shared Hosting is usually the starting point for most bloggers and anyone new to online business. Shared hosting plans are usually the best in terms of pricing and flexibility. They are the shortest path to get your online business up and running.

Let’s analyze below the shared hosting plans of both companies, as well as its pros and cons

Siteground Shared Hosting

Below we have a screenshot of the SiteGround shared plans offers:

SiteGround shared hosting plans are divide in StartUp, GrowBig i GoGeek. The StartUp is the most affordably shared hosting plan by SiteGround, at just $3.95 per month. However it has some important limitations, such as being able to run just one website from it.

The GrowBig plan for $5.95 per month is the most recommended for new bloggers. It has few limitations and offers a lot of possibilities to manage a few websites. It offers 20 GB or web space, which for blogs is more than enough.

The GoGeek can be good idea if you have a more complex project and also if you migrating a successful website to SiteGround.

Bluehost Shared Hosting


The basic Bluehost plan starts from an amazing $2.95 per month, but just like SiteGround, it is limited to one site.

The plus plan costs $5.45 per month and is extremely flexible. It offers unlimited sites and unmetered bandwidth and storage, which is extremely appealing

In terms of shared hosting pricing, Bluehost has an advantage, as it has less limitations for a slightly lower price than SiteGround.

Click here to check Bluehost plans and click here to check SiteGround web hosting plans.

Cloud and Dedicated Hosting

Cloud and dedicated hosting are recommended for experienced users, and heavy traffic websites. They can also be used to run any kind of application based on a server, not necessarily websites.

In terms of pricing, then tend to cost considerably more than shared hosting or VPS, but they have unique advantages. Bluehost offers some of the cheapest cloud hosting on the market, which is much cheaper than the offers available on SiteGround. The same is true for dedicated servers, however, Bluehost is also cheaper than SiteGround for dedicated server plans.

WordPress Hosting

Comparing Bluehost vs SiteGround WordPress hosting, we can see that they are both ideal to run our favorite CMS.

SiteGround WordPress hosting offers are the same as the shared hosting ones. Bluehost on the other hand, has specific WordPress hosting plans, with solutions and extras especially aimed at WordPress customers.

Bluehost’s cheapest WordPress hosting is called wp standard, starting at $19.99 per month. It includes SiteLock CDN, free SSL and a few other advantages.

Customer Support

Costumer support might not seem to be an evident aspect when it comes to hosting comparisons, but it is. In fact, it is a critical point and should be thoroughly considered before purchasing a hosting plan. Let’s compare below how both SiteGround and Bluehost perform in terms of customer support.

Bluehost customer support: like most main hosting companies, Bluehost offers support in a number of ways, includint telephone and chat 24/7/365. I haven’t had a single occasion that in which their support was not available. However, at times, the queue can be long, especially on the chat. Overall the Bluehost support is very efficient, and it is unlikely that your issues won’t be solved quickly.

SiteGround customer support: SiteGround also offers support 24/7/365, on the same terms as Bluehost. That includes phone support and a live chat. From my personal experience both chat and phone supports are pretty fast. From my personal experience I have waited less to be in contact with a support operator on SiteGround when compared to Bluehost. Even if SiteGround is faster, the difference was not extremely high.

WordPress Install

Nowadays, installing WordPress is a pretty straightforward process in most hosting companies. As WordPress is the most popular content management system currently available, all companies strive to offer a smooth and fast install in their hosting services.

Bluehost offers a guide on this link on how to install WordPress using their hosting plans.

SiteGround also provides a guide for manual WordPress installation. It offers also the possibility of installing quickly through cPanel.

Free Domain

Getting a free domain when purchasing a hosting plan is definitely something positive, and not available in all hosting companies. In our comparison of Bluehost vs SiteGround, both companies offer a free domain for any hosting purchase.

Dedicated IP and SSL

Dedicated IP and SSL certificates are increasingly becoming more important, even for smaller websites. They improve the security and credibility of your website, thus increasing also its SEO.

SiteGround offers you the possibility of adding dedicated ips to all plans (but there might be limitations in the number of IPs depending on the plan).

Bluehost also offers the possibility of getting a dedicated IP for your hosting plan.

Adding a dedicated IP in both hosting providers will usually cost, unless the service you purchase already includes it. You can also buy more than one dedicated IP, depending on your hosting plan.

You can get free SSL using both Bluehost and SiteGround.


After this thorough analysis it has become clearly evident that each of these two companies have their own advantages, as well as limitations.

In technical terms, both Bluehost and SiteGround offer excellent services. That includes high uptime, fast server respose time and pretty safe servers. They also offer add-ons like SSL and dedicated IPs on similar terms.

In terms of products and pricing, Bluehost has some advantages as it offers more products. It is also more affordable in terms of pricing.

SiteGround on the other hand tends to have faster replies on their customer support.

In the comparison of SiteGround vs Bluehost both are great hosting companies. If you starting a new blog or website, the shared plans have competitive prices and also offer similar specs. For those looking for dedicated hosting, Bluehost might be a better option as its considerably cheaper than SiteGround.

We have also a great Bluehost review if you want to read more details about the company. As for SiteGround, we are still preparing a full review, so you can come back to check it after a few weeks when it will be online.

Did you like our Bluehost vs SiteGround review? Do you have any experience with these companies? Write on the comment section which company is the best in your opinion.

This post contains affiliate links. When a user clicks an affiliate link he will be redirected to one of the hosting companies. If he purchases a service from this company earns a small commission of that sale value. Clicking an affiliate link does not change the final price of any of the products offered.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *